Tarsem's The Fall

The Fall
The Fall The Fall

Tarsem is known for his visuals, and indeed it was the trailer for The Fall that convinced to go see it on the big screen, despite my dislike of his first and only other film, The Cell, which was all style over substance. But I had read that The Fall was a labor of love that Tarsem had been working on for over a decade, and that the images were in service of a greater story. This is both true and untrue.

It's true in the sense that it is a very intelligent film that happens to have beautiful visuals. It's untrue in the sense that much of the time the beautiful visuals are clearly arbitrary, based on beautiful locations Tarsem happened upon while shooting commercials all over the world. But The Fall is meant to be a fictional story, not a sequel to Baraka (which is already in production anyway), and so I must evaluate it on those terms. And in that regard, The Fall is a qualified success as well, except for some pacing and structural problems that sometimes made me an impatient viewer.

Set in the 1930's, the story is sort of a mix of The Wizard of Oz and Pan's Labryinth, about a young immigrant girl (Catinca Untaru) convalescing in a Southern California hospital. She befriends a stuntman (Lee Pace) who was paralyzed in an on-set accident, and who begins to tell her a fantastical story about five heroes who band together to fight their mutual enemy, Governor Odious.

For reasons that are somewhat essential to the plot, the story is disorganized and capricious (e.g., Charles Darwin teaming up with a stereotyped Italian explosives expert and an ex-slave), which while consistent with the overall theme, leads to those pacing problems I mentioned above. The focus of the film is partly on how an intelligent young child with a limited grasp of English interpret stories in her mind, incorporating real elements in her life, and often misinterpreting basic elements (like imagining an Indian who lost his wigwam and "squaw" as the turbaned type from a land of grand palaces). And it's partly about how the story is able to affect and sometimes manipulate the little girl, to whom who lives and dies in the story actually matters.

The premise of the film is responsible both for its good and not-so-good qualities, yet in the week or so since I saw the film, the not-so-good qualities have declined in importance and my opinion of the film has improved.

One last thing I enjoyed: The Fall is tangentially about early Hollywood filmmaking, and Tarsem includes two great montages in the film, one about limb amputations, and the other about falling stuntmen. I hereby nominate Tarsem to be the montage editor of the next Academy Awards ceremony.


<<< Pregnancy and sensationalism    IOLET: Music from the World of Anathem >>>
Tags:

Your description made me think of Baron Munchausen. Any similarities?

Jon May | Tue, 06/24/2008 - 2:27pm

Some of the fantastical elements are similar in spirit, but half of The Fall is grounded in the Real World story, so that makes it quite different. Plus, the fantastical elements in The Fall tie into the real story in a more logical fashion, whereas Munchausen is sort of out there all the time.

crazymonk | Tue, 06/24/2008 - 2:43pm

its been a while since i saw it and my opinion of the film shifted in the other direction. i was impressed by the visuals, but i dont see much more to the film than that. i havent seen the cell, but im inclined to believe id have a similar take - that the visuals drove the story rather than the other way around. the Real World scenes provided a shortcut to get whatever tarsem wanted on the screen without having to get the characters there within the limits of their own story. and if ive got the story right, the cell required its characters to journey into the mind of killer in order to get to that movie's visuals. seems like the same trick, or the same fault of tarsem's as a storyteller. the pacing of the fall was insufferable for me, not only because of the tediousness of improv with a child who's just recently learned to speak english, but because it was filler. i didnt find anything insightful about the nature of storytelling or the way someone interprets stories in those scenes. the device works - the princess bride or the neverending story, for example - but tarsem seems to think hes doing or saying something new and lingers on it for far too long. but he can shoot a commercial for me any time.

jmd | Tue, 06/24/2008 - 4:15pm

Wow, jmd's review of this is dead on. I liked many moments of the film and I thought the actors were great, but as stated by others, the pace was terrible, including those odd scenes with the little girl where it was obvious she was messing up her lines, etc. It was in no way as terrible as the Cell--that film was almost unwatchable--but I still doubt Tarsem's talent as a filmmaker. But he is a good image maker.

Los Angeles Anthony | Tue, 06/24/2008 - 5:36pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <blockquote> <b>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options