Election 2006

After a well-needed rest yesterday, I'm back to say a few things about what transpired on November 7th, 2006. Most of you already know that Nevada's Question 7, the Regulation of Marijuana Initiative, for which I spearheaded the Internet campaign, did not pass. The final breakdown was 44% for, 56% against. Let me say a few things about this.
First, the good news: we did 5 points better than the similar initiative that failed in 2002 with only 39% of the vote -- that equates to about 100,000 55,000 more votes for ending marijuana prohibition in Nevada over four years, although some of that number naturally comes from the population growth in the past few years. But because the actual percentage went up, we clearly won over a new group of voters. Unlike in 2002, we outright won a county with 53% of the vote (the libertarian-oriented Storey County, home of Virginia City) and nearly won Washoe County, home of Reno and the second-biggest county in the state, with 48%. Washoe, incidentally, is considered a more conservative county than Clark County, the home of Las Vegas; it has more Republicans registered than Democrats, the opposite of Clark. Washoe also had a higher turnout rate than Clark County.
Some good news also came by way of the exit polling results, although, being a statistical sampling, they can't be considered entirely reliable. In any case, the exit polls showed us winning among the Latino population, which I imagine will only get bigger in the upcoming years. We also won outright among Democrats and Independents, taking all of our losses among Republicans (which, I admit, doesn't exactly jive with Washoe's results). We broke about even with union members (even though almost every union publicly came out against us), and easily won the 18-29 age group.
Now let's look at the not-so-good news: we only got 44% in Clark County, seeing nary a difference from the state results in this heavily Democratic county. Incidentally, turnout was the lowest in the state in Clark County, meaning that despite our herculean efforts, we couldn't get out the transient population as much as we would've liked. Clearly, we didn't do so well in the rest of the rural counties, which make up about 1/6th of the state's population. Moving over to the exit polls, we received only 40% of the African-American vote. (The White vote was similar to the final results.) We did 3 points better among men than among women. And while we ran a close race in every age group above 29 and below 60, we got killed by the elderly population in Nevada. In fact, it wouldn't be far-fetched to say that we lost the campaign essentially because we couldn't convince the elderly population that the harms of prohibition are worse than the harms of marijuana.
And really, while I'm not happy about it, that result makes sense. We're talking about the generations of people older than the Baby Boomers who never lived in a culture -- even as youths -- where marijuana use was common and accepted. This World War II generation generally looked down upon the late-60's culture. They never smoked marijuana in dorm rooms while listening to Sinatra and, from what I've seen in movies, preferred the poison served in highballs than from the cannabis plant. It seems fairly obvious to me that when the Baby Boomers become the predominant elderly population, marijuana prohibition will be on its last legs.
The last thing I want to mention is what a damn good campaign we ran. Every single member of the senior staff was not only competent, but passionate about the cause and creative in their ideas. We had no major missteps, and quite a few breakthroughs that impressed the media, both local and national. Our campaign manager Neal was anal about our messaging, but it's clear from the end results that our commercials paid off handsomely. And I do feel that, with my colleague Sean (and with the ideas of the entire staff, especially Neal's initial vision), we put together one of the most Internet-savvy statewide campaigns I've ever seen. Because all of our phone banking and data entry tools were written for the web, the hundreds of thousands of calls and data entries made (with the help of bar scanners) were all done on Linux computers, except for those done over the web by our volunteers. Our blog had over 600 posts during the campaign, thanks to our Communications staff, and our message board was sometimes too popular. We put over 80 videos up on YouTube and received nearly cumulative 100,000 views of those videos. We had over 6,000 MySpace friends. During the 15 days of voting, we used the Google Map API to allow any voter in Washoe and Clark counties to find and get directions to their nearest voting locations. And we text messaged thousands of voters and volunteers with voting locations and information about how they could help. We did a lot more than that for our internal politicking, but I won't get into it here.
On a final note, I should say that while Question 7's loss was hard for all of us at the campaign, Wednesday was still a great day to wake up to. I, of course, was thrilled to hear that American voters finally decided to show their displeasure with the Republican party, sweeping in a Democratic House and Senate and sweeping out Donald Rumsfeld. I was happy that South Dakota voted down the abortion ban (but alas, medical marijuana failed there with 48% of the vote) and that Arizona voted down a gay marriage ban. Unfortunately, the Democratic wave that hit the country must have been blocked by the very same mountains that divide Nevada from the verdant valleys of California. The Democratic candidate governor got about the same percentage of the vote as Question 7, even after her Republican opponent was caught up in three scandals, one sexual, one financial, and the third hypocritical. While some of the higher offices such as attorney general and treasurer went Democratic, the Republicans held onto the one Senate seat up for grabs and the two competitive House seats. However, on a what is to me a cosmically hilarious note, the heavily-funded attempt by casinos to confuse voters from implementing a smoking ban failed -- which means the Nevada of chain-smoking marathons of video poker in grocery stores and 7-11's will be gone within a month. I'll say more on this later, but let me end with this: the greatest trick that Nevada ever pulled was convincing the world that it is libertarian.
<<< Rumsfeld stepping down Neal Stephenson on Second Life >>>

Sorry to hear that prop 7 didn't pass. What's next for you CM?
Don't know yet. I'm finishing up some work in the campaign for now, but I'll let you know when I figure things out.
FWIW, I mentioned that I know someone who worked on Question 7 to my internet friend who's from Vegas, and he told me he really appreciated that you sent out blank voter registration cards.
I say we kill all the old people. Or threaten to revoke their AARP memberships if they don't vote for a similar initiative next time around.
Logan's Run is on my Netflix queue.
logan's run is pretty good. but i recommend soylent green as "best worst 70s sci-fi movie."
ps, don't talk to me about killing old people. i work in theater!
I love Soylent Green. It is by no means a "worst" in any way.
I just watched The Andromeda Strain (1971) the other day. It was damn good.
Soylent Green is actually a well made, interesting film. Though not as good as Planet of the Apes. Logan's Run, while interesting, is pretty dated and not all that great. If you want a good/bad 70s film I would go with Omega Man. God I love 70's Heston.
I have the soundtrack to Andromeda Strain- it's truly wicked, something between early 70s fusion and way out synth and tape manipulation. By the way, am I missing something CM, or was comment 5 just a total non-sequiter?
It was a response to comment #4.
dude, that's why i said it's the "BEST worst 70s sci-fi movie." i loved it when i saw it: the opening sequence is really odd and not what you'd expect, and kind of panic-inducing. and then the movie is a really well-plotted murder mystery that has very little to do with "soylent green is people." it's great.
and throughout the whole movie, for some reason, i was like "who IS this guy? he's doing a total chuck heston impersonation!" and i kept saying things like "this is ridiculous! he's just doing chuck heston - why didn't they get chuck heston?!"
i can't explain it. it was the weirdest 95 minutes of my life.
also it was edward g. robinson's final film. "nyaaah, where's your messiah now? nyaaah!"
Logan's Run is made out of people!
Nice work on the campaign CM and a nice post-election-post. Please tell me you and Lee have read David Hickey's article in the November Harper's where he follows Dina Titus on the campaign trail? You may remember Hickey from previous 'you have to read' rants of mine...please do.
I know about the article but I haven't grabbed a Harper's yet. But I will.
I saw your picture in the Nevada scetion of the R-J yesterday. Can you autograph my copy?
I can't believe there was no commentary on the socialist movement! they got one step closer to telling us what we can and can't do like in there home land "Nazi Germany"
QUESTION 5 just blows me away! 40 something thousand or more kitchen workers are or are going to be unemployed because these Nazis like to take there kids to bars! Talk about family entertainment! let's take the kids to a bar to watch people get drunk and fish out the weirdos or what ever... any way I agree with the stopping of smoking in convenience/groceries stores, malls, and many other places parents will find more appropriate environments for kids.
I just think there are more inappropriate parents then smokers here in Nevada!
my point some people smoke 2 times more when drinking then any other time and they blow more money and in a nice dark bar the owner is doing good. so what purpose did the high priced food back in the old days (last month) serve in bars "well obviously good entertainment venues for kids" but really what better way to keep people from getting too drunk on an empty stomach, well those where the days because bars want "drinking, gambling, and low and behold SMOKING patrons" smokers because most neighborhood bar dwellers are smokers too bad they can't get a bite to eat to ease the effects of too much alcohol in there system "the onset/beginnings of alcohol poisoning" or throwing up all over the place.
any way my meaningless rant! you can't stop the socialist movement, but now there is no more reason for kids to be in Las Vegas Bars is there? that one bite the bad parents in the butt!
Post new comment