Wallace on Federer

David Foster Wallace writes about the "religious experience" of watching Swiss tennis superstar Roger Federer in action. I was lucky to see one of his matches from a very close distance at the US Open several years back. He was astounding. Wallace:

[T]he truth is that TV tennis is to live tennis pretty much as video porn is to the felt reality of human love.

Update: I found the great Federer shot that Wallace describes early in the essay on YouTube. You'll find it here at 8:08, with a subsequent replay.
(via ss)


<<< Star Trek convention in Vegas    The LA Times on the Snakes on a Plane premiere >>>
Tags:

so is federer more like Hal Incandenza or John Wayne? I would say john wayne at first, from his court dominance. but DFW's point about federer having the speed & power, mixed with touch & intelligence to drag his opponents around, makes me think, in the end, that hal and rog are of the same mold.

liam | Sat, 08/19/2006 - 10:28am

i don't remember hal's actual tennis style being discussed much...i think pemulis was probably dfw's interpretation of himself, not necessarily that talented, but able to compensate with math (not sure if pemulis is as explicitly described as such, but he's known to be good at math and i just sorta figured), and IIRC wayne was very powered, and a disliked character, and i wondered if maybe DFW was trying to channel sampras (i think it was sampras, i may be thinking of aggasi) who was sort of one note, and who dfw disliked

Jon May | Sat, 08/19/2006 - 10:48pm

he may be a great athlete, but he's still a fucking euro. that sort of limits his usefulness to the human race.

jbg | Sun, 08/20/2006 - 6:16am

ummm.... what?

liam | Sun, 08/20/2006 - 4:04pm

Yes...I would just like to echo and endorse my fellow liam's preceding comment: "ummm....what?" --with perhaps just the slightest added tinge of hostility and scorn.

Liam | Sun, 08/20/2006 - 10:13pm

I think jbg is referring to the little known fact that while roger federer is a great tennis player, he is, in fact, a euro. As in a coin valid in a bunch of European countries and worth $1.29. He's not human, but metal, and fits in your pocket, and amazingly never goes off in a metal detector (which i find incredibly cool). Say what you will about humans and coins, but I think it's undebatable that the first is infinitely more useful than the other, if only because of the opposable thumbs of humans. that federer can be such a great player without opposable thumbs (or arms or hands or legs or eyes, etc) only makes him that much more amazing to watch. he's more useful than most euros (most euros can't play tennis) but less useful than any person that can be exchanged for 3 croissants in any boulangerie in paris and can play two or more sports.

Jon May | Mon, 08/21/2006 - 1:18am

wow, taipei must be boring.

crazymonk | Mon, 08/21/2006 - 7:33am

crazymonk++

Lorelei | Mon, 08/21/2006 - 2:03pm

that was a great article. the only thing I took issue with was the statement that "no one" talks about male athletes in terms of beauty.

jesse | Mon, 08/21/2006 - 6:11pm

the problem is i get tired early but don't want to go to sleep so i do things like this to keep me up until at least 10 or so.

Jon May | Mon, 08/21/2006 - 8:06pm

that was inspirational tennis. beautiful. almost as virtuoso as when crazymonk and I used to play.

Liam | Mon, 08/21/2006 - 10:15pm

you should also link to one of yutube's shot of Zidane's greatest goal. it is pure poetry.

Liam | Mon, 08/21/2006 - 10:17pm

I like the idea of incrementing CrazyMonk by one... so, like, he'd be two crazy monks...

I'm envisioning Steve Martin as one of the two monks.

Ingen Angiven | Sun, 08/27/2006 - 2:20pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <blockquote> <b>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options