Infinite Jest and the Wraith

For Infinite Jest fans: Parts one and two of George Carr's interesting take on the scene late in the book where the wraith interfaces with the hospitalized Don Gately. There are some crucial insights here, but it doesn't get into the wraith's possible other doings in other parts of the novel.


<<< It's getting louder everyday    High-tech food >>>
Tags:

how many wallace-l members read this blog other than you and me?

Jon May | Tue, 05/02/2006 - 10:06am

i've never publicized the url to them, so probably none. but plenty of my readers have read IJ.

crazymonk | Tue, 05/02/2006 - 10:39am

I finally just picked up a copy of the book, $8 from a street vendor, great shape, I'm psyched. Definitely getting read this summer. In the meantime, I have nothing constructive to add.

Jesse | Tue, 05/02/2006 - 11:37am

I read it. Does that make me cool?

I don't remember the details of the scene very well though, is it worth reading the analysis?

Ingen Angiven | Tue, 05/02/2006 - 11:52am

Nerds! Oh wait, I've read the book as well. How could anyone remeber the details of that book well. It was thick, yo!

New York Anthony | Tue, 05/02/2006 - 2:40pm

I doubt George was going completely from memory, but if you've read the book 2 or 3 times, especially very closely, making margin notes, etc., the details start to sink in. The wraith stuff never did. Maybe it was more boring to me. Maybe I just stopped paying as close attention by that point.

Jon May | Tue, 05/02/2006 - 4:40pm

(puffing out my chest) i just re-read it. it was just as amazing the second time around. possibly more.

liam | Wed, 05/03/2006 - 2:01pm

First, if it's so wonderful how DFW was confronting and transcending meta-fiction and engaging the reader "full-bore", then why would anyone analyze it limply just like any other meta-fiction? Who the hell cares about self-redonkulous tertiary author-reader analogies? The wraith's significance to the book, and its potential impact on a careful reader's consciousness, and even what it meta-means for lit-crit-purposes, is about 1000 times more profound than what Mr. Carr presents, sorry dude. DFW lifted those meta games and puzzles like dead weights and they were pulled to him, not him to them, was kind of one of the points of the book, to me anyway.

Paul C. | Fri, 07/18/2008 - 6:21am
Paul C. | Fri, 07/18/2008 - 6:55am

Mostly.

Paul C. | Fri, 07/18/2008 - 7:17am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <blockquote> <b>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options