crazymonk.org is owned and operated by Marco Carbone, currently located in Reno, NV. Questions and other interpersonal attempts should be directed to crazymonk@crazymonk.org.
Recent Topics
sites i read
Feeds
Recent comments
- It might be "inhabitants
crazymonk
53 min 49 sec ago - I was also impressed by the
Jon May
1 hour 21 min ago - whoa
melinda
1 hour 50 min ago - the spike jonze's "exploding
leum
5 hours 18 min ago - I saw this comment the other
RumorsDaily
21 hours 18 min ago - So well timed- I've been
Jesse
21 hours 42 min ago - also, the reason i brought
jbg.
1 day 2 hours ago - i know. it was an
jbg.
1 day 2 hours ago - not to be unnecessarily
Jesse
1 day 14 hours ago - i agree with jesse.
jbg.
4 days 56 min ago

I doubt that it's really possible to intentionally develop people's visions of a traditional neighborhood. The reason people got to know each other is because they've been living together for a long time, not because of the swing sets. When a new neighbor moved in, there was a chance to incorporate them into the group. If there's nothing but new neighbors, who's going to be incorporated into what?
When you build a new development, regardless of your plan to put a butcher shop below someone's apartment, you won't have the sense of community that is needed in order to, ironically, create a sense of community. People will live in the town and drive to work miles away. People will still go to the full supermarket to buy food, probably on the way home from work. And if they weren't inclined to interact with their neighbors before, there's no reason they're going to do so now. A pre-existing community might draw them in, but who's going to bother to build one from scratch?
This is not the way you'll recreate the traditional town.
I think they just develop, I don't think you can force them. I'm not against being proven wrong, though.
Post new comment